Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] libxc: allow passing a device tree blob to the guest

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 17:42 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 17:31 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] libxc: allow passing a device 
> > tree blob to the guest"):
> > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 17:09 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > But AFAICT you fail to reject DTBs on x86, and don't arrange to
> > > > provide them to the kernel either.
> > > 
> > > It'd have to reject it, since DTB isn't used much on x86 outside of
> > > specific embedded use case, would an ifdef be acceptable?
> > 
> > I don't particularly mind how it's done.  You could define an
> > always-failing DTB function in the x86 libxc code, alternatively.
> 
> I'll have a dig and see which feels more natural in the context.

I went with the ifdef since it seemed most natural to keep most of this
functionality in xc_dom_core alongside all the other stuff for kernels
and initrds etc.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel