[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 5 V3] tools/libxl: Control network buffering in remus callbacks [and 1 more messages]
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:06 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 V3] tools/libxl: Control network
> buffering in remus callbacks [and 1 more messages]"):
> > Regardless of the answer here, would it make sense to do some/all of the
> > checkpoint processing in the helper subprocess anyway and only signal
> > the eventual failover up to the libxl process?
>
> It might do. Mind you, the code in libxc is tangled enough as it is
> and is due for a rewrite. Perhaps this could be done in the helper
> executable,
That's where I meant.
> although there isn't currently any way to easily
> intersperse code in there.
A simple matter of programming surely ;-)
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
