Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix bug_line()

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/10/2013 16:25, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Due to the packing into a bit field together with a relocated field,
> the computation can overflow when the relocated field ends up getting a
> negative value stored. Hence it isn't sufficient to correct the value
> by 1 in this case, but we also need to mask the result to the width of
> the original bit field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h
> @@ -15,9 +15,11 @@ struct bug_frame {
>  
>  #define bug_loc(b) ((const void *)(b) + (b)->loc_disp)
>  #define bug_ptr(b) ((const void *)(b) + (b)->ptr_disp)
> -#define bug_line(b) ((((b)->line_hi + ((b)->loc_disp < 0)) <<
> \
> +#define bug_line(b) (((((b)->line_hi + ((b)->loc_disp < 0)) &
> \
> +                       ((1 << BUG_LINE_HI_WIDTH) - 1)) <<
> \
>                        BUG_LINE_LO_WIDTH) +
> \
> -                     (b)->line_lo + ((b)->ptr_disp < 0))
> +                     (((b)->line_lo + ((b)->ptr_disp < 0)) &
> \
> +                      ((1 << BUG_LINE_LO_WIDTH) - 1)))
>  #define bug_msg(b) ((const char *)(b) + (b)->msg_disp[1])
>  
>  #define BUGFRAME_run_fn 0
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel