[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 4.2.3 - xen: vector 0x2 is not implemented
----- netwiz@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 9/10/2013 12:53 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > > ----- netwiz@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >> On 9/10/2013 2:56 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > >>> On 10/08/2013 10:41 AM, Steven Haigh wrote: > >>>> On 10/09/2013 01:31 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > >>>>> On 10/08/2013 08:42 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 10:50 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've had a report of a host starting to give this output: > >>>>>>> Oct 7 19:36:37 kernel: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on > >> CPU { 2} > >>>>>>> (t=273561 jiffies g=17919 c=17918 q=9688) > >>>>>>> Oct 7 19:36:37 kernel: sending NMI to all CPUs: > >>>>>>> Oct 7 19:36:37 kernel: xen: vector 0x2 is not implemented > >>>>>> This bit is just a symptom triggered by the initial rcu stall > >> which is > >>>>>> your real problem. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That said I thought the NMI thing was fixed recently, which > might > >> have > >>>>>> gotten you better debugging on the rcu problem. > >>>>> This went into v3.12-rc1 (commit 6efa20e). > >>>>> > >>>>> Steven, can you try your test with newer kernels that have this > >> fix? > >>>>> With > >>>>> it we should be able to see where the stall is happening. > >>>> Sadly I can't easily rebuild this to 3.12. Is it possible to get > a > >>>> version / patch / commit that will work with 3.11.x? > >>> > >>> I am not sure I understand what you are asking for. A backport of > >> the > >>> patch to 3.11.x so that you apply it on top of your sources and > >> build it > >>> yourself? > >> > >> Correct. I have a buildroot set up for building 3.11.x into RPMs > that > >> would take a lot of work to change to 3.12. As this is a problem > with > >> 3.11 as well (as I don't run or provide 3.12 anywhere), I'd like > to > >> test > >> the fix on 3.11. > > > > I am attaching the patch to 3.11.4 (which is exactly the same as the > one > > that went into 3.12 btw). I only compile-tested it to make sure that > it builds. > > > >> > >> Eventually, it will need to be fixed in the 3.11 series as well. > >> > > > > It's unlikely to go into 3.11 since it's really a new feature and > not a bug fix. > > Thanks, I'll test this and see what I can turn up. The problems are > happening in 3.11.2 at this stage - which causes the system to become > unresponsive and a load of 45+. It also causes network traffic to > stop. > > As such, it should probably be looked at as a bugfix for 3.11. Just to be clear: this patch is not to make your hang go away: it's a way for kernel to produce stack trace that will (hopefully) show where the hang is. So don't get your hopes high that it will fix your problem ;-) -boris > Will try and get further results and revert back when I can provide more > feedback. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |