|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1 net] xen-netback: transition to CLOSED when removing a VIF
On 07/10/13 14:43, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:55:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> If a guest is destroyed without transitioning its frontend to CLOSED, >> the domain becomes a zombie as netback was not grant unmapping the >> shared rings. >> >> When removing a VIF, transition the backend to CLOSED so the VIF is >> disconnected if necessary (which will unmap the shared rings etc). >> >> This fixes a regression introduced by >> 279f438e36c0a70b23b86d2090aeec50155034a9 (xen-netback: Don't destroy >> the netdev until the vif is shut down). >> > > Is this regression solely caused by 279f438e36c or caused by both > ea732dff5c and 279f438e36c? I ask because you make use of the new state > machine introduced in ea732dff5c. Or are you simply using the new state > machine to fix the regression instead of going back to old code? I bisected it to 279f438. I'm just using the handy new state machine to fix it. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |