[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: Fix assert in send_SGI_one

To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:37:43 +0100
Cc: stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:37:53 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> The GIC can handle maximum 8 cpus (0...7). The CPU id 7 is still valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Dissociate logical and gic/hardware CPU ID
  - From: Julien Grall
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: Fix assert in send_SGI_one
  - From: Julien Grall

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] xen/arm: Initialize correctly IRQ routing
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] xen/arm: Dissociate logical and hardware CPU ID
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: Fix assert in send_SGI_one
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] xen/arm: gic: Use the correct CPU ID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.