[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-arm-xen baseline test] 19698: tolerable FAIL
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 15:40 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > xen.org writes ("[linux-arm-xen baseline test] 19698: tolerable FAIL"): > > "Old" tested version had not actually been tested; therefore in this > > flight we test it, rather than a new candidate. The baseline, if > > any, is the most recent actually tested revision. > > > > flight 19698 linux-arm-xen real [real] > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/19698/ > > > > Failures :-/ but no regressions. > > > > Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: > ... > > build-armhf-pvops 4 kernel-build fail never pass > > BC kernel/timeconst.h > /bin/sh: 1: bc: not found > make[1]: *** [kernel/timeconst.h] Error 127 > make: *** [kernel] Error 2 > > I will arrange for bc to be installed. Thanks! How did I not see this I wonder -- I installed the box using ./ts-foo and certainly didn't install anything extra by hand. Oh well. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |