Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] xen/vNUMA: vNUMA support for PV guests.

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On mar, 2013-09-17 at 08:05 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.09.13 at 08:44, Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Please don't top post.
> 
> > George, after talking to Dario, I think the max number of physical
> > nodes will not exceed 256. Dario's automatic NUMA
> > placement work with this number and I think it can be easily u8.
> > Unless anyone has other thoughts.
> 
> With nr_vnodes being uint16_t, the vnode numbers should be
> too. Limiting them to u8 would possibly be even better, but then
> nr_vnodes would better be unsigned int (perhaps that was the
> case from the beginning, regardless of the types used for the
> arrays).
> 
> The pnode array surely can also be uint8_t for the time being,
> considering that there are other places where node IDs are
> limited to 8 bits.
> 
All agreed.

> And with struct acpi_table_slit having just 8-bit distances, there's
> no apparent reason why the virtual distances can't be 8 bits too.
> 
> But - all this is only for the internal representations. Anything in
> the public interface should be wide enough to allow future
> extension.
> 
And, in fact, 'node_to_node_distance' in xen/include/public/sysctl.h
(http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/include/public/sysctl.h)
is uint32.

Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel