[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] hvm/vpmu: Prevent dump handlers from incorrectly mutating state
On 9/12/2013 2:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: Discovered by Coverity, CID 1055181 core2_vpmu_dump() was incorrectly setting VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED when it was intending to check for it. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> This would have been avoided if the dump function declared all its pointers "const" - doing this now (also in SVM). Also fixing some indentation issues at once. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c @@ -415,10 +415,10 @@ static void amd_vpmu_destroy(struct vcpu }/* VPMU part of the 'q' keyhandler */-static void amd_vpmu_dump(struct vcpu *v) +static void amd_vpmu_dump(const struct vcpu *v) { - struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); - struct amd_vpmu_context *ctxt = vpmu->context; + const struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); + const struct amd_vpmu_context *ctxt = vpmu->context; unsigned int i;printk(" VPMU state: 0x%x ", vpmu->flags);@@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ static void amd_vpmu_dump(struct vcpu *vrdmsrl(ctrls[i], ctrl);rdmsrl(counters[i], cntr); - printk(" 0x%08x: 0x%lx (0x%lx in HW) 0x%08x: 0x%lx (0x%lx in HW)\n", - ctrls[i], ctxt->ctrls[i], ctrl, - counters[i], ctxt->counters[i], cntr); + printk(" %#x: %#lx (%#lx in HW) %#x: %#lx (%#lx in HW)\n", + ctrls[i], ctxt->ctrls[i], ctrl, + counters[i], ctxt->counters[i], cntr); } }--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c @@ -678,11 +678,11 @@ static void core2_vpmu_do_cpuid(unsigned }/* Dump vpmu info on console, called in the context of keyhandler 'q'. */-static void core2_vpmu_dump(struct vcpu *v) +static void core2_vpmu_dump(const struct vcpu *v) { - struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); + const struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); int i, num; - struct core2_vpmu_context *core2_vpmu_cxt = NULL; + const struct core2_vpmu_context *core2_vpmu_cxt = NULL; u64 val;if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED) )@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void core2_vpmu_dump(struct vcpuif ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING) ){ - if ( vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) ) + if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) ) printk(" vPMU loaded\n"); else printk(" vPMU allocated\n"); @@ -703,10 +703,11 @@ static void core2_vpmu_dump(struct vcpu /* Print the contents of the counter and its configuration msr. */ for ( i = 0; i < num; i++ ) { - struct arch_msr_pair* msr_pair = core2_vpmu_cxt->arch_msr_pair; + const struct arch_msr_pair *msr_pair = core2_vpmu_cxt->arch_msr_pair; + if ( core2_vpmu_cxt->pmu_enable->arch_pmc_enable[i] ) printk(" general_%d: 0x%016lx ctrl: 0x%016lx\n", - i, msr_pair[i].counter, msr_pair[i].control); + i, msr_pair[i].counter, msr_pair[i].control); } /* * The configuration of the fixed counter is 4 bits each in the @@ -716,9 +717,9 @@ static void core2_vpmu_dump(struct vcpu for ( i = 0; i < core2_fix_counters.num; i++ ) { if ( core2_vpmu_cxt->pmu_enable->fixed_ctr_enable[i] ) - printk(" fixed_%d: 0x%016lx ctrl: 0x%lx\n", - i, core2_vpmu_cxt->fix_counters[i], - val & FIXED_CTR_CTRL_MASK); + printk(" fixed_%d: 0x%016lx ctrl: %#lx\n", + i, core2_vpmu_cxt->fix_counters[i], + val & FIXED_CTR_CTRL_MASK); val >>= FIXED_CTR_CTRL_BITS; } } --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct arch_vpmu_ops { void (*arch_vpmu_destroy)(struct vcpu *v); int (*arch_vpmu_save)(struct vcpu *v); void (*arch_vpmu_load)(struct vcpu *v); - void (*arch_vpmu_dump)(struct vcpu *v); + void (*arch_vpmu_dump)(const struct vcpu *); };int vmx_vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *, unsigned int flags); Acked-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |