[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at drivers/xen/balloon.c:353
On 09/10/2013 12:30 PM, David Vrabel wrote: On 10/09/13 17:12, Ian Jackson wrote:Now that we are on Linux 3.4.y, I am once again trying to commission my pair of weevils. Things are better than they were but it's still totally broken. Below you can see the logs from my adhoc osstest flight 19169. I looked at one of the save/restore failures (test-amd64-i386-xl) and see this: Sep 10 00:03:09.073066 [ 240.142970] kernel BUG at drivers/xen/balloon.c:353! I'd appreciate any help available with debugging this. The logs are here: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/19169/test-amd64-i386-xl/info.html I looked at the code in balloon.c: BUG_ON(!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap) && phys_to_machine_mapping_valid(pfn)); Ian. Sep 10 00:03:08.629133 [ 240.142955] ------------[ cut here ]------------ Sep 10 00:03:09.073066 [ 240.142970] kernel BUG at drivers/xen/balloon.c:353! Sep 10 00:03:09.073102 [ 240.142974] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Sep 10 00:03:09.081064 [ 240.142978] Modules linked in: xen_acpi_processor xen_gntalloc ext4 jbd2 mbcache e1000e Sep 10 00:03:09.093059 [ 240.142987] CPU: 6 PID: 847 Comm: kworker/6:1 Not tainted 3.11.0+ #1There's a know bug in this area with 3.11+ (3.12-rc0) and there is pending pull request for the fix. If you are thinking about preempt count bug then its' likely a different one. -boris I am a bit confused by the reference to 3.4.y above. Is this BUG in a guest running 3.11+ on a host with 3.4.y as dom0? Or have you accidentally installed 3.11+ as your dom0 kernel? David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |