|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/7] xen/arm: gic: Use the correct CPU ID
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 16:42 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 02:28 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 14:30 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the logical
> >> CPU numbering.
> >>
> >> When Xen wants to send an SGI to specific CPU, it needs to use the GIC CPU
> >> ID.
> >> It can be retrieved from ITARGETSR0, in fact when this field is read, the
> >> GIC
> >> will return a value that corresponds only to the processor reading the
> >> register.
> >> So Xen can use the PPI 0 to initialize the mapping.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> index cadc258..4f3a8a5 100644
> >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> @@ -57,6 +57,27 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint64_t, lr_mask);
> >>
> >> static unsigned nr_lrs;
> >>
> >> +/* The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the
> >> + * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC
> >> + * itself
> >> + */
> >> +#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8
> >> +static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly = {0xff};
> >
> > Isn't this mapping from logical cpus ids to gic cpus ids? IOW the size
> > of this array is the wrong way around?
>
> This array maps a logical cpu id (the index) to a gic cpus id. The size
> if correct, because Xen will allocate logical cpu id from 0 to 7.
Oh right, yes.
I think NR_CPUS (which should be 8 given the other limitations) is the
right size for this array.
>
> > Is what you want here is a per-cpu variable?
>
> Does per-cpu variable allow any cpu to retrieve data of another cpu? I
> didn't find a such function.
per_cpu(variable, cpu) will do it.
>
> >> +
> >> +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned int cpu;
> >> + unsigned int mask = 0;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask)
> >> + {
> >> + ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF);
> >> + mask |= gic_cpu_map[cpu];
> >
> > Further to above, can't cpu here be e.g. 0x100 for an a7 on a big.ITTLE
> > system?
>
> 0x100 is the hardware CPU id. Xen will allocate a logical cpu id from 0.
Right.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |