[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1 03/29] xen/dts: Don't check the number of address and size cells in process_cpu_node
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 15:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > CPU nodes are not required to have #address-cells == 1 and #size-cells == 0, > so > don't check for that (see Linux > Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt > Section III.5.a). > > In some OMAP5 device, tree, these 2 properties are not correctly set. > Therefore, > Xen will only able to handle 1 CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: baozich@xxxxxxxxx > > --- > Changes in v2: > - Update commit message > --- > xen/common/device_tree.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c > index 3a3c99c..c4f0f2c 100644 > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c > @@ -414,12 +414,6 @@ static void __init process_cpu_node(const void *fdt, int > node, > const u32 *cell; > paddr_t start, size; > > - if ( address_cells != 1 || size_cells != 0 ) > - { > - early_printk("fdt: node `%s': invalid #address-cells or #size-cells", > - name); > - return; > - } > > prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "reg", NULL); > if ( !prop ) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |