[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] HVM support for e820_host (Was: Bug: Limitation of <=2GB RAM in domU persists with 4.3.0)
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:04:42 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h index b2ead7f..2fa700d 100644 --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ #define E820_RESERVED 2 #define E820_ACPI 3 #define E820_NVS 4 +#define E820_UNUSABLE 5 + +#define E820MAX 128 struct e820entry { uint64_t addr; I don't think we actually need +#define E820_UNUSABLE 5 any more because it is no longer used anywhere in the patch. Do we need that extra e820 hole type? I guess it's only useful if we want to explicitly signify that a memory hole is inherited from the host e820 map, rather than _really_ needed. Otherwise we could probably just use E820_RESERVED in it's place. Gordan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |