Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: AVX instruction emulation fixes

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 28/08/2013 09:32, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> - we used the C4/C5 (first prefix) byte instead of the apparent ModR/M
>   one as the second prefix byte
> - early decoding normalized vex.reg, thus corrupting it for the main
>   consumer (copy_REX_VEX()), resulting in #UD on the two-operand
>   instructions we emulate
> 
> Also add respective test cases to the testing utility plus
> - fix get_fpu() (the fall-through order was inverted)
> - add cpu_has_avx2, even if it's currently unused (as in the new test
>   cases I decided to refrain from using AVX2 instructions in order to
>   be able to actually run all the tests on the hardware I have)
> - slightly tweak cpu_has_avx to more consistently express the outputs
>   we don't care about (sinking them all into the same variable)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel