[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 23/23] PVH xen: introduce vmexit handler for PVH

>>> On 23.08.13 at 01:22, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In general, we should have less interecepts for PVH, eg, there should
> be no MSR_IA32_CR_PAT intercept.

How that? All memory management supposedly is HVM-like, and
PAT is an integral part of memory management. Unless I'm
mistaken, not intercepting PAT writes would mean you allow the
guest access to the physical MSR, which surely is wrong.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.