[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 10/24] xen/dts: Remove device_get_reg call in process_memory_node
On 08/22/2013 02:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 22:05 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> The function device_get_reg will be removed in a future patch. > > Why? It appears to be a useful helper. This helper is only used in few places and can be replaced by: - dt_read_number because #address-cells and #size-cells have no meaning - 2 consecutive call to dt_next_cell - dt_get_address > >> >> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/common/device_tree.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c >> index 95635f0..ea01a5a 100644 >> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c >> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c >> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt, >> int node, >> const struct fdt_property *prop; >> int i; >> int banks; >> - const u32 *cell; >> + const __be32 *cell; >> paddr_t start, size; >> >> if ( address_cells < 1 || size_cells < 1 ) >> @@ -402,12 +402,13 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void >> *fdt, int node, >> return; >> } >> >> - cell = (const u32 *)prop->data; >> + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data; >> banks = device_tree_nr_reg_ranges(prop, address_cells, size_cells); >> >> for ( i = 0; i < banks && early_info.mem.nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ ) >> { >> - device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, &start, >> &size); >> + start = dt_next_cell(address_cells, &cell); >> + size = dt_next_cell(size_cells, &cell); >> early_info.mem.bank[early_info.mem.nr_banks].start = start; >> early_info.mem.bank[early_info.mem.nr_banks].size = size; >> early_info.mem.nr_banks++; > > -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |