Re: [Xen-devel] Linux/x86's _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY definition

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.08.13 at 12:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>was anyone of you involved in the recent (rc5->rc6) changes here?
>>I'm asking because this new definition conflicts with _PAGE_PAT,
>>which is unused only for native Linux (and I continue to not really
>>understand their motivation to restrict themselves to just the four
>>most trivial memory types).
> 
> I have not.  Does it cause regressions?

Afaict it obviously will; luckily I noticed it while merging, so I didn't
get to the point where any problem would be noticed.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel