[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] ARM: parse separate DT properties for different commandlines
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:32 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > On 20 August 2013 14:11, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:19 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >> On 20 August 2013 13:09, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On 07/10/2013 01:48 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 3 June 2013 14:43, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Currently we use the chosen/bootargs property as the Xen commandline > >> >>> and rely on xen,dom0-bootargs for Dom0. However this brings issues > >> >>> with bootloaders, which usually build bootargs by bootscripts for a > >> >>> Linux kernel - and not for the entirely different Xen hypervisor. > >> >>> Introduce a new possible device tree property "xen,xen-bootargs" > >> >>> explicitly for the Xen hypervisor and make the selection of which to > >> >>> use more fine grained: > >> >>> - If xen,xen-bootargs is present, it will be used for Xen. > >> >>> - If xen,dom0-bootargs is present, it will be used for Dom0. > >> >>> - If xen,xen-bootargs is _not_ present, but xen,dom0-bootargs is, > >> >>> bootargs will be used for Xen. Like the current situation. > >> >>> - If no Xen specific properties are present, bootargs is for Dom0. > >> >>> - If xen,xen-bootargs is present, but xen,dom0-bootargs is missing, > >> >>> bootargs will be used for Dom0. > >> >>> > >> >>> The aim is to allow common bootscripts to boot both Xen and native > >> >>> Linux with the same device tree blob. If needed, one could hard-code > >> >>> the Xen commandline into the DTB, leaving bootargs for Dom0 to be set > >> >>> by the (non Xen-aware) bootloader. > >> >>> I also have a simple patch for u-boot to transfer the content of the > >> >>> "xen_bootargs" environment variable into the xen,xen-bootargs dtb > >> >>> property. > >> >>> I will post the u-boot patch to their ML later. > >> >>> > >> >>> Changes from v1: > >> >>> - fix whitespace issues > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Any news about this patch ? :) > >> > > >> > > >> > Sorry for the lag ;-) > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> --- > >> >>> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > >> >>> xen/common/device_tree.c | 7 ++++++- > >> >>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> >>> > >> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >> >>> index b92c64b..5809489 100644 > >> >>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >> >>> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static int write_properties(struct domain *d, > >> >>> struct > >> >>> kernel_info *kinfo, > >> >>> u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells) > >> >>> { > >> >>> const char *bootargs = NULL; > >> >>> + int had_dom0_bootargs = 0; > >> >>> int prop; > >> >>> > >> >>> if ( early_info.modules.nr_mods >= 1 && > >> >>> @@ -169,11 +170,17 @@ static int write_properties(struct domain *d, > >> >>> struct kernel_info *kinfo, > >> >>> */ > >> >>> if ( device_tree_node_matches(fdt, node, "chosen") ) > >> >>> { > >> >>> - if ( strcmp(prop_name, "bootargs") == 0 ) > >> >>> + if ( strcmp(prop_name, "xen,xen-bootargs") == 0 ) > >> >>> + continue; > >> >>> + if ( strcmp(prop_name, "xen,dom0-bootargs") == 0 ) > >> >>> + { > >> >>> + had_dom0_bootargs = 1; > >> >>> + bootargs = prop_data; > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Here, you overwrite the previous "bootargs". This variable is set if > >> >> the module node contains "bootargs" property > >> >> (see process_multiboot_node in common/device_tree.c) > >> > > >> > > >> > I'd say that is intended. I think those command lines directly under > >> > /chosen > >> > should have the highest priority. If someone has > >> > /chosen/xen,dom0-bootargs, that should be used instead of a most likely > >> > hard-coded value under modules. > >> > >> I don't think people use bootargs in module. > > > > They are documented as existing in > > docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt, so something would need to change > > in either the code or the docs I think. > > The wiki page only mentions xen,dom0-bootargs solution :). Do the wiki pages use the /modules stuff at all? If not then would not expect they would use /module/N/bootargs either. > BTW, Andre, can you document this patch at least in docs/misc/arm? I think this is a must. In fact IIRC this was the main reason the patch wasn't just applied. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |