Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: use "R" constraint for fxsaveq/fxrstorq enforcement

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 13/08/13 16:43, Jan Beulich wrote:

I became aware of this constraint's (referring to all legacy registers
in one go) existence by (accidentally) noticing Linux commit 82024135
("x86-64, fpu: Simplify constraints for fxsave/fxtstor").

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ static inline void fpu_fxrstor(struct vc
             ".previous                \n"
             _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
             :
-            : "m" (*fpu_ctxt), "i" (sizeof(*fpu_ctxt) / 4),
-              "cdaSDb" (fpu_ctxt) );
+            : "m" (*fpu_ctxt), "i" (sizeof(*fpu_ctxt) / 4), "R" (fpu_ctxt) );
         break;
     case 4: case 2:
         asm volatile (
@@ -162,7 +161,7 @@ static inline void fpu_fxsave(struct vcp
          * addressing mode that doesn't require extended registers.
          */
         asm volatile ( REX64_PREFIX "fxsave (%1)"
-                       : "=m" (*fpu_ctxt) : "cdaSDb" (fpu_ctxt) );
+                       : "=m" (*fpu_ctxt) : "R" (fpu_ctxt) );
 
         /*
          * AMD CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel