[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
- To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:02:51 +0300
- Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, drjones@xxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, agraf@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, habanero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ouyang@xxxxxxxxxxx, mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx, avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chegu_vinod@xxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srivatsa.vaddagiri@xxxxxxxxx, attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 01:04:15 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >>Please let me know, if I should rebase again.
> > >>
> > >
> > >tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need
> > >to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
> >
> > Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
> > (Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
> > Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.
>
> >From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work.
>
For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK.
--
Gleb.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
