[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] xen: set the right flags when enabling interrupts for 8250
On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Chen Baozi <baozich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 07/25/2013 12:31 PM, Chen Baozi wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/25/2013 10:14 AM, Chen Baozi wrote: >>>> >>>>> Besides this test, I noticed that we set a timer to poll UART after >>>>> enabling >>>>> the interrupt. And the timer initialization codes are platform specific, >>>>> which >>>>> should be implemented in xen/arch/arm/platforms/omap5.c for example. >>>>> However, >>>>> I haven't done this yet. (I used to plan to turn to this work after UART >>>>> porting >>>>> has been done.) Is it a possible factor that may cause my issues? >>>> >>>> Xen uses the arch timers to handle the time. On some platform (for >>>> instance the Arndale), it's not enabled by default. >>>> >>>> If the omap5 boot with the arch timers enabled, you don't need to >>>> implement the init_time callback. >>>> >>>> Do you know if Xen receives timer interrupts? >>> >>> Any way that I could confirm this? >>> >>> There is a line of boot message: >>> >>> "Using generic timer at 0 KHz." >>> >> >> It seems the arch timer is not configured/enabled. Do you know if U-boot >> enables it? > > I could see clocks.c/clocks.o in its u-boot sources, but I don't think U-boot > has already enabled it, for I could read such lines from Linux kernel boot > messages: > > """ > OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER1 at 32768 Hz > sched_clock: 32 bits at 32kHz, resolution 30517ns, wraps every 131071999s > OMAP clocksource: 32k_counter at 32768 Hz > arch_timer: No interrupt available, giving up > omap5_realtime_timer_init: arch_timer_register failed -22 > >> >> It's not clear to me, how you need to implement init_time. Do you have a >> datasheet with the board? If yes, is there a section for the section timer? > > Yes, TI has published an 49.6MB Technical Reference Manual online with 88 > pages section about timer. Wait. I think I might make a mistake. The "arch timer" is different from "timer" as devices, right? The timer section in Technical Reference Manual seems to be the latter one, for it is connect to the Level-4 interconnect of OMAP5432 and described as "ti,omap5430-timer" in DTS. I think the "arch timer" you mentioned should refer to "arm,armv7-timer", right? > >> >> Perhaps the good start is linux/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c. > > Thanks a lot, it should be helpful! > > Baozi > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |