[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2] x86/xen: during early setup, only 1:1 map the ISA region
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 25/07/13 16:46, Aurelien Chartier wrote: >> On 22/07/13 15:29, David Vrabel wrote: >>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> During early setup, when the reserved regions and MMIO holes are >being >>> setup as 1:1 in the p2m, clear any mappings instead of making them >1:1 >>> (execept for the ISA region which is expected to be mapped). >>> >>> This fixes a regression introduced in 3.5 by 83d51ab473dd >(xen/setup: >>> update VA mapping when releasing memory during setup) which caused >>> hosts with tboot to fail to boot. >>> >>> tboot marks a region in the e820 map as unusable and the dom0 kernel >>> would attempt to map this region and Xen does not permit unusable >>> regions to be mapped by guests. >>> >>> (XEN) 0000000000000000 - 0000000000060000 (usable) >>> (XEN) 0000000000060000 - 0000000000068000 (reserved) >>> (XEN) 0000000000068000 - 000000000009e000 (usable) >>> (XEN) 0000000000100000 - 0000000000800000 (usable) >>> (XEN) 0000000000800000 - 0000000000972000 (unusable) >>> >>> tboot marked this region as unusable. >>> >>> (XEN) 0000000000972000 - 00000000cf200000 (usable) >>> (XEN) 00000000cf200000 - 00000000cf38f000 (reserved) >>> (XEN) 00000000cf38f000 - 00000000cf3ce000 (ACPI data) >>> (XEN) 00000000cf3ce000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) >>> (XEN) 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) >>> (XEN) 00000000fe000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) >>> (XEN) 0000000100000000 - 0000000630000000 (usable) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v2: Extend 1:1 mapping region to cover 0 - 1MiB. find_ibft_region() >>> scans from 512 KiB and if this overlapped with a reserved region it >>> would crash. >> >> I made more extensive testing and I was wrong, the crash I reported >has >> been fixed upstream. I am able to boot a 3.11-rc1 kernel without any >> patch applied. However, I am still seeing errors in the log : >> >> (XEN) mm.c:901:d0 Error getting mfn 800 (pfn 5555555555555555) from >L1 >> entry 0000000000800463 for l1e_owner=0, pg_owner=0 >> >> David's patch is fixing those errors. >> >> I also tried applying that patch to 3.8.13.4, but dom0 was still >> crashing at boot time : > >Does this >(http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-07/msg00701.html) >patch work better? > >I do think hiding UNUSABLE regions from dom0 is the right thing to do >and will be a more reliable fix going forwards, but Konrad didn't >agree. > >David It well might but we need to: - Know why it is still happening after a fix that is tailored towards the fix and still does not work with stable kernels. What are we missing? - it is unclear to me how this will affect PV DomU with PCI pass through which use e820_hole parameter - which means that the e820 in the guest is similar to the host one. We can't break them. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |