Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 00/23]PVH xen: Phase I, Version 10 patches...

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:24:32PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/07/13 07:21, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On 24/07/2013 02:59, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Keir,
> >>
> >> These V10 patches are in pretty good shape. I've addressed all the
> >> issues Jan had in previous versions, and jfyi, he and I've been back
> >> and forth on pretty much every patch in this series. Lot of the patches
> >> have 'acked' or 'reviewed' tags. Kindly review.
> > These need to get in the tree now, or they're going to miss yet another
> > cycle. Hasn't it been two/three years?
> >
> > Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Other than my minor nit in patch 4,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If possible, I will see about putting these patches in and running a
> standard set of regression tests.  Given the extent of changes to both

Yeeey!

> regular HVM and PV guests, it would be nice to know if there are any
> obvious problems caused by the introduction of PVH.

Absolutly. That is why I am glad that Mukesh split them up to make
these the 'prep' patches so if there are regressions we can easily
identify them now.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel