[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] XSAVE/XRSTOR crash resurgence in 4.3
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Ben Guthro <ben.guthro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 16.07.13 at 18:57, Ben Guthro <ben.guthro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> On 15.07.13 at 15:49, Ben Guthro <ben.guthro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> The following output was from a WinXP SP3 guest (32bit) on a Lenovo T430: >>>>> >>>>> (XEN) d1v0: fip=1b773d6e9a fdp=23773d1c48 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v0: FIP=1b773d6e9a FDP=23773d1c48 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=1b79e78dee fdp=230012e3b4 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: FIP=1b79e78dee FDP=230012e3b4 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=0000:79e78dee fdp=0000:0012e3b4 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=0000:79e78dee fdp=0000:0012e3b4 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=0000:79e78dee fdp=0000:0012e3b4 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=0000:79e78dee fdp=0000:0012e3b4 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=1b79e78dee fdp=230012d528 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: FIP=1b79e78dee FDP=230012d528 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v0: fip=4500000000 fdp=4b1000000000 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v0: FIP=4500000000 FDP=4b1000000000 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: fip=1b773d6e9a fdp=23773d1c48 w=8 >>>>> (XEN) d1v1: FIP=1b773d6e9a FDP=23773d1c48 w=8 >>>> >>>> Well, it should have been quite obvious (to me) that this is >>>> related to xsaveopt behavior (according to my own observations >>>> of cases where the selector/offset fields don't get written). Could >>>> you double check whether the system(s) you see the problem on >>>> support xsaveopt, and if so, simply comment out the conditionals >>>> that cause it to be used? >>> >>> They do support xsaveopt. >>> I'll ifdef these out for tonight's test run. > > There was a problem with my commit for this test run, so I did not get > the data I wanted. > > I will test with this patch tonight. Testing runs over the past few nights were successful, with this patch. While not totally conclusive - I would say that this solved the problem. Thank you again. Ben >> And attached/below also a tentative fix. >> >> Jan >> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c >> @@ -72,9 +72,24 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask >> if ( word_size <= 0 || !is_pv_32bit_vcpu(v) ) >> { >> if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt ) >> + { >> + /* >> + * xsaveopt may not write the FPU portion even when the >> respective >> + * mask bit is set. For the check further down to work we hence >> + * need to put the save image back into the state that it was in >> + * right after the previous xsaveopt. >> + */ >> + if ( word_size > 0 && >> + (ptr->fpu_sse.x[FPU_WORD_SIZE_OFFSET] == 4 || >> + ptr->fpu_sse.x[FPU_WORD_SIZE_OFFSET] == 2) ) >> + { >> + ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel = 0; >> + ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel = 0; >> + } >> asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xae,0x37" >> : "=m" (*ptr) >> : "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr) ); >> + } >> else >> asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xae,0x27" >> : "=m" (*ptr) >> >> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |