|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen/grant_table: use the new GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace hypercall
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 18:32 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> The current GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace (7) is deprecated, rename
> it to GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace_legacy.
We would normally call this foo_compat.
> Introduce the new
> GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace (12) and detect at boot time which one is
> available.
I don't think this exists yet, is there a h/v patch under separate
cover?
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: alex@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: dcrisan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/xen/grant-table.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/xen/grant_table.h | 1 +
> include/xen/interface/grant_table.h | 8 +++++---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
> index 04c1b2d..0f7d00b 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ static grant_ref_t gnttab_free_head;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gnttab_list_lock);
> unsigned long xen_hvm_resume_frames;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_hvm_resume_frames);
> +int __read_mostly gnttabop_unmap_and_replace = GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gnttabop_unmap_and_replace);
I can see this getting set but not used, does it really need to be
exported?
>
> static union {
> struct grant_entry_v1 *v1;
> @@ -1238,6 +1240,12 @@ int gnttab_init(void)
> gnttab_free_count = nr_init_grefs - NR_RESERVED_ENTRIES;
> gnttab_free_head = NR_RESERVED_ENTRIES;
>
> + ret = HYPERVISOR_grant_table_op(GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace, NULL, 1);
> + if (ret == -ENOSYS) {
> + gnttabop_unmap_and_replace = GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace_legacy;
> + pr_warn("GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace unavailable, falling back
> to the racy legacy version\n");
Perhaps WARN_ONCE?
> + }
> +
> printk("Grant table initialized\n");
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/xen/grant_table.h b/include/xen/grant_table.h
> index 694dcaf..867d1a7 100644
> --- a/include/xen/grant_table.h
> +++ b/include/xen/grant_table.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ int arch_gnttab_map_status(uint64_t *frames, unsigned
> long nr_gframes,
> void arch_gnttab_unmap(void *shared, unsigned long nr_gframes);
>
> extern unsigned long xen_hvm_resume_frames;
> +extern int gnttabop_unmap_and_replace;
> unsigned int gnttab_max_grant_frames(void);
>
> #define gnttab_map_vaddr(map) ((void *)(map.host_virt_addr))
> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> b/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> index e40fae9..2a2b74f 100644
> --- a/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> +++ b/include/xen/interface/grant_table.h
> @@ -408,15 +408,17 @@ DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(gnttab_query_size);
> /*
> * GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace: Destroy one or more grant-reference mappings
> * tracked by <handle> but atomically replace the page table entry with one
> - * pointing to the machine address under <new_addr>. <new_addr> will be
> - * redirected to the null entry.
> + * pointing to the machine address under <new_addr>.
> + * GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace_legacy also redirects <new_addr> to the
> + * null entry
I wonder if rather than _legacy (or _compat) if the old behaviour might
be well described as "unmap_and_swap", since I think that is what
clearing new_addr means?
>
> * NOTES:
> * 1. The call may fail in an undefined manner if either mapping is not
> * tracked by <handle>.
> * 2. After executing a batch of unmaps, it is guaranteed that no stale
> * mappings will remain in the device or host TLBs.
> */
> -#define GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace 7
> +#define GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace_legacy 7
> +#define GNTTABOP_unmap_and_replace 12
> struct gnttab_unmap_and_replace {
> /* IN parameters. */
> uint64_t host_addr;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |