[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3: x86 32 bit code removed or depreciated?
----- Original Message ----- > From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>; xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 12:32 > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3: x86 32 bit code removed or depreciated? > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Just to be clear, this is the 32-bit *hypervisor* which was removed. >>> 32-bit tools in a 32-bit dom0 still work. >>> >> >> Thanks. Thanks for clearing that up. Perhaps off-topic for dev, but are > there any advantages to running a 32 bit dom0 as in this configuration? > > Probably the biggest thing is about performance. Until the PVH mode > is implemented, 64-bit PV guests will have a performance degradation, > due to the way the architecture changed between 32-bit and 64-bit. > The reason is quite technical, but you can read a summary of it here: > > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/10/31/the-paravirtualization-spectrum-part-2-from-poles-to-a-spectrum/ > > -George Thanks. I was alluding to this when I asked. I have looked at the blog post before when trying to understand what PVH was. I will give it a proper read. Hopefully I can follow enough of it. Thanks again. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |