 
	
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen: use domid check in is_hardware_domain
 On 07/08/2013 10:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.07.13 at 16:46, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Yes, that is the model I am using. It splits dom0 into three domains: 0. Domain builder: bootstraps the system. May remain to perform requested builds of domains that need a minimal trust chain (i.e. vTPM domains). Other than being built by the hypervisor, nothing is special about this domain - although it may be useful to have is_control_domain be true. 1. Hardware domain: manages devices for PCI pass-through to driver domains or can act as a driver domain itself, depending on the desired degree of disaggregation. This is the only domain where is_hardware_domain() is true. The return of is_control_domain() is false for this domain. 2. Control domain: manages other domains, controls guest launch/shutdown, manages resource constraints, etc; is_control_domain() returns true. This model has a working implementation derived from the work in the XOAR paper. It requires a patch on top of these to change the IOMMU setup to happen after dom0 starts, and a dedicated domain builder domain. -- Daniel De Graaf National Security Agency _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel 
 
 
 | 
|  | Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |