[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [tip:timers/core] hrtimers: Support resuming with two or more CPUs online (but stopped)
Well with David's patch the warning is still hit as path is the same and WARN_ON_ONCE in question doesn't check wait, should it? Thomas' patch does seem to work. On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:25:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, David Vrabel wrote: > > You failed to CC Artem :( > > > On 05/07/13 10:30, Artem Savkov wrote: > > > This commit brings up a warning about a potential deadlock in > > > smp_call_function_many() discussed previously: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/18/546 > > > > Can we just avoid the wait in clock_was_set()? Something like this? > > > > 8<------------------------------------------------------ > > hrtimers: do not wait for other CPUs in clock_was_set() > > > > Calling on_each_cpu() and waiting in a softirq causes a WARNing about > > a potential deadlock. > > > > Because hrtimers are per-CPU, it is sufficient to ensure that all > > other CPUs' timers are reprogrammed as soon as possible and before the > > next softirq on that CPU. There is no need to wait for this to be > > complete on all CPUs. > > > > on_each_cpu() works by IPIing all CPUs which will ensure > > retrigger_next_event() will be called as earlier as possible and > > before the next softirq. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c > > index e86827e..fd5d391 100644 > > --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c > > +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c > > @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void clock_was_set(void) > > { > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS > > /* Retrigger the CPU local events everywhere */ > > - on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 1); > > + on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0); > > #endif > > timerfd_clock_was_set(); > > } > > -- > > 1.7.2.5 > > > > > > > > > > [ 4363.082047] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory > > > [ 4363.082471] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 4363.083800] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3977 at kernel/smp.c:385 > > > smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x2c0() > > > [ 4363.085789] Modules linked in: > > > [ 4363.086542] CPU: 0 PID: 3977 Comm: pm-suspend Tainted: G W > > > 3.10.0-next-20130705 #126 > > > [ 4363.088634] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 > > > [ 4363.090402] 0000000000000181 ffff88001f403d98 ffffffff81d2e2b7 > > > ffffffff821cdb2e > > > [ 4363.092366] 0000000000000000 ffff88001f403dd8 ffffffff810a278c > > > ffff88001f403dd8 > > > [ 4363.094215] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > ffffffff82561898 > > > [ 4363.096094] Call Trace: > > > [ 4363.096656] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81d2e2b7>] dump_stack+0x59/0x82 > > > [ 4363.098259] [<ffffffff810a278c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 > > > [ 4363.099762] [<ffffffff810a27da>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > > > [ 4363.100925] [<ffffffff81118fcd>] smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x2c0 > > > [ 4363.101937] [<ffffffff8110f0dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > > > [ 4363.102870] [<ffffffff810d7030>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x30/0x30 > > > [ 4363.103737] [<ffffffff811193bb>] smp_call_function+0x3b/0x50 > > > [ 4363.104609] [<ffffffff810d7030>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x30/0x30 > > > [ 4363.105455] [<ffffffff8111943b>] on_each_cpu+0x3b/0x120 > > > [ 4363.106249] [<ffffffff810d743c>] clock_was_set+0x1c/0x30 > > > [ 4363.107168] [<ffffffff810d825c>] run_hrtimer_softirq+0x2c/0x40 > > > [ 4363.108055] [<ffffffff810acf26>] __do_softirq+0x216/0x450 > > > [ 4363.108865] [<ffffffff810ad297>] irq_exit+0x77/0xb0 > > > [ 4363.109618] [<ffffffff81d414da>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4a/0x60 > > > [ 4363.110569] [<ffffffff81d40032>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80 > > > [ 4363.111467] <EOI> [<ffffffff8110eb24>] ? mark_held_locks+0x134/0x160 > > > [ 4363.112481] [<ffffffff810f52af>] ? arch_suspend_enable_irqs+0x2f/0x40 > > > [ 4363.113457] [<ffffffff810f528e>] ? arch_suspend_enable_irqs+0xe/0x40 > > > [ 4363.113910] [<ffffffff810f54c1>] suspend_enter+0x1d1/0x270 > > > [ 4363.114320] [<ffffffff810f5794>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0x390 > > > [ 4363.114887] [<ffffffff810f5a74>] enter_state+0xf4/0x150 > > > [ 4363.115288] [<ffffffff810f5aeb>] pm_suspend+0x1b/0x70 > > > [ 4363.115662] [<ffffffff810f452b>] state_store+0xeb/0xf0 > > > [ 4363.116055] [<ffffffff815d3fc7>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x20 > > > [ 4363.116468] [<ffffffff8126f113>] sysfs_write_file+0xb3/0x100 > > > [ 4363.116890] [<ffffffff811f0aca>] vfs_write+0xda/0x170 > > > [ 4363.117274] [<ffffffff811f10b2>] SyS_write+0x62/0xa0 > > > [ 4363.117645] [<ffffffff815e01fe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f > > > [ 4363.118118] [<ffffffff81d3f399>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > > [ 4363.118558] ---[ end trace 87cc49a77badea1e ]--- > > > [ 4363.119093] Enabling non-boot CPUs ... > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:18:37PM -0700, tip-bot for David Vrabel wrote: > > >> Commit-ID: 7c4c3a0f18ba57ea2a2985034532303d2929902a > > >> Gitweb: > > >> http://git.kernel.org/tip/7c4c3a0f18ba57ea2a2985034532303d2929902a > > >> Author: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> AuthorDate: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:35:44 +0100 > > >> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> CommitDate: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 23:15:06 +0200 > > >> > > >> hrtimers: Support resuming with two or more CPUs online (but stopped) > > >> > > >> hrtimers_resume() only reprograms the timers for the current CPU as it > > >> assumes that all other CPUs are offline at this point in the resume > > >> process. If other CPUs are online then their timers will not be > > >> corrected and they may fire at the wrong time. > > >> > > >> When running as a Xen guest, this assumption is not true. Non-boot > > >> CPUs are only stopped with IRQs disabled instead of offlining them. > > >> This is a performance optimization as disabling the CPUs would add an > > >> unacceptable amount of additional downtime during a live migration (> > > >> 200 ms for a 4 VCPU guest). > > >> > > >> hrtimers_resume() cannot call on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event,...) > > >> as the other CPUs will be stopped with IRQs disabled. Instead, defer > > >> the call to the next softirq. > > >> > > >> [ tglx: Separated the xen change out ] > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Link: > > >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372329348-20841-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> kernel/hrtimer.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > > >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c > > >> index fd4b13b..e86827e 100644 > > >> --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c > > >> +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c > > >> @@ -773,15 +773,24 @@ void clock_was_set(void) > > >> > > >> /* > > >> * During resume we might have to reprogram the high resolution timer > > >> - * interrupt (on the local CPU): > > >> + * interrupt on all online CPUs. However, all other CPUs will be > > >> + * stopped with IRQs interrupts disabled so the clock_was_set() call > > >> + * must be deferred to the softirq. > > >> + * > > >> + * The one-shot timer has already been programmed to fire immediately > > >> + * (see tick_resume_oneshot()) and this interrupt will trigger the > > >> + * softirq to run early enough to correctly reprogram the timers on > > >> + * all CPUs. > > >> */ > > >> void hrtimers_resume(void) > > >> { > > >> + struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = > > >> &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases); > > >> + > > >> WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(), > > >> KERN_INFO "hrtimers_resume() called with IRQs > > >> enabled!"); > > >> > > >> - retrigger_next_event(NULL); > > >> - timerfd_clock_was_set(); > > >> + cpu_base->clock_was_set = 1; > > >> + __raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ); > > >> } > > >> > > >> static inline void timer_stats_hrtimer_set_start_info(struct hrtimer > > >> *timer) > > >> -- > > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > > >> in > > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > >> > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Artem _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |