[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/2] xen: arm: implement early prink for 8250 uart
On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:38 PM, "Bamvor Jian Zhang" <bjzhang@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Ian > >>>> Wrote "Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>"> On Tue >> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 21:11 +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote: >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/debug-8250.inc >>> b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/debug-8250.inc >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..c11357d >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/debug-8250.inc >>> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ >>> +/* >>> + * xen/arch/arm/arm32/debug-8250.inc >>> + * >>> + * 8250 specific debug code >>> + * >>> + * Bamvor Jian Zhang <bjzhang@xxxxxxxx> >>> + * Copyright (c) 2013 SUSE >>> + * >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >>> + * (at your option) any later version. >>> + * >>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >>> + * GNU General Public License for more details. >>> + */ >>> + >>> + >>> +#define UART_TX (0x00<<2) /* Out: Transmit buffer */ >>> +#define UART_LSR (0x05<<2) /* In: Line Status Register */ >> >> Is the shift 2 on Baozi's platform too? Perhaps this could be a #define >> provided in the same style as EARLY_UART_BASE_ADDRESS or via some other >> means? >> >> The definitions themselves duplicate those in >> xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c, perhaps we could refactor those into a >> suitable header? > yes. it should be. meanwhile considering the shift bit and other things. > i am not sure how to merge the headers until i got the ns16550 actual used by > arm SOC. Actually, I've already modified ns16550 driver to work on my platform. And it also has the shift problem. If you like, I could send a patch to refactor it, :-) Baozi > > Bamvor >> >>> + >>> +#define UART_LSR_THRE 0x20 /* Xmit holding register empty */ >>> + >>> +/* 8250 UART wait UART to be ready to transmit >>> + * rb: register which contains the UART base address >>> + * rc: scratch register */ >>> +.macro early_uart_ready rb, rc >>> +1: >>> + ldr \rc, [\rb, #UART_LSR] /* <- UART_LSR (Line Status >>> Register) */ >>> + tst \rc, #UART_LSR_THRE /* Check BUSY bit */ >>> + beq 1b /* Wait for the UART to be ready */ >>> +.endm >>> + >>> +/* 8250 UART transmit character >>> + * rb: register which contains the UART base address >>> + * rt: register which contains the character to transmit */ >>> +.macro early_uart_transmit rb, rt >>> + str \rt, [\rb, #UART_TX] /* -> UART_TX */ >>> +.endm >>> + >>> +/* >>> + * Local variables: >>> + * mode: ASM >>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil >>> + * End: >>> + */ > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |