[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(v, MSR_SHADOW_GS_BASE)
>>> On 01.07.13 at 11:44, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/07/13 10:38, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 28.06.13 at 23:02, Cyclonus J <cyclonusj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I am wondering if we can disable the VMX interception for >>> MSR_SHADOW_GS_BASE as AMD is already doing that. >> I can't immediately see any reason why we shouldn't be permitted >> to do this, but I also don't think this should be performance critical. >> >> If you feel this is important, why don't you contribute a patch, >> with its description saying under what conditions this can yield >> measurable benefit? > > Will this not cause a VMexit on each swapgs instruction, as the > instruction itself does write to MSR 0xC0000102? No - see the comments in vmx.c around the handling of that MSR. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |