[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] nested virtualization test report for Xen 4.3-RC1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:47 PM > To: George Dunlap > Cc: Ren, Yongjie; Xu, Dongxiao; xen-devel; Zhang, Xiantao > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] nested virtualizaiton test report for Xen 4.3-RC1 > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:37:56PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Ren, Yongjie <yongjie.ren@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > This the a nested virtualization test report for Xen 4.3-RC1 on Intel > hardware. We use Linux 3.9.1 as Dom0. > > > a. Virtual EPT and VMCS shadowing features can work fine. > > > b. Xen, KVM and VMware can basically work on top of L0 Xen. > > > c. 32bit/64bit Linux and Windows are covered as L2 guests. > > > > Sorry I just saw this -- thanks for the nice enumeration. > > > > Two questions. First, I don't see the Win7 "XP compatibility mode" on > > this list -- that would be L0 Xen, L1 Win7, L2 XP. This seems like > > probably the most likely actual real-world use of nested virt. Is > > that on your radar at all? > > So far, I didn't test this case. That's a good use case. I'll add this case in my next report about nested virt. > > Secondly, what do you think is the primary use case for Xen-on-Xen (or > > KVM-on-Xen, &c)? Who would want to use it and why? > > I'm not sure which type of nested virt is more important. But I heard some use cases as following. 1. public cloud (e.g. Amazon EC2: if they can provide virtual VMX to the VMs, that can be a value-added service.) 2. QA: Nested virt can make QAs easy to set up the testing env (especially: virt/cloud areas). In a Ovirt Workshop, I heard some guys have been testing Ovirt in KVM nested virtualization. Some OpenStack guys also told me that they want to test OpenStack in a VM not on physical host. 3. competition counter: In some BBS, I ever heard someone said "VMware have nested virt cap; why Xen doesn't support?" Best Regards, Yongjie (Jay) > > I can think of at least two use-cases: > > - Xen-on-Xen might be good for testing/debugging the hypervisor.. Much > easier to crash and debug the virtual Xen rather than physical machine. > - Xen-on-Xen makes it possible to create easy-and-fast-to-clone > lab/poc/test environments with "full" functionality thanks to virtual vmx > and ept.. > > > -- Pasi > > > > Thanks, > > -George > > > > > > > > There are three basic entities in Xen nested virtualization. > > > L0: Xen (64bit Xen and 64bit Dom0), which is at the bottom > of the nested stack. > > > L1: Xen or KVM or VMware or VirtualBox (all in 64bit > mode) > > > L2: Linux or Windows guest, which is at the top of the nested > stack. > > > (when saying 'KVM on Xen', I mean L0 hypervisor is Xen and L1 > hypervisor is KVM.) > > > > > > Workable cases: (Pass) > > > 1. virtual EPT and VMCS shadowing feature enabled > > > 2. 64bit Linux/Windows as L2 guest for "Xen on Xen" > > > 3. 64bit Linux guest as L2 guest for "KVM on Xen" > > > 4. L1 KVM and L1 Xen simultaneously running on a L0 Xen > > > 5. L2 guest Save/Restore and local migration for "KVM on Xen" > > > 6. AVX and XSAVE in L2 guest for "KVM on Xen" > > > 7. some workloads (e.g. LTP, Kernel-build, UnixBench) can work fine in > 64bit L2 Linux guest > > > 8. 64bit Linux L2 guest can boot up for "VMware on Xen" > > > 9. 32bit L2 guest (Linux/Windows) booting on "Xen on Xen" (not use > EPT in L1) > > > 10. 32bit/64bit Windows and 32bit Linux L2 guest booting on "VMware > on Xen" (not use EPT in L1) > > > N.B. Only if you don't use EPT feature in L1 hypervisor, case #9 and #10 > can work fine. > > > > > > Non-workable cases: (Fail) > > > 1. 32bit/64bit Windows L2 guest booting on "KVM on Xen" > > > 2. L2 guest Save/Restore and local migration for "Xen on Xen" > > > 3. Migration "from L0 to L1" for "Xen on Xen" > > > 4. Migration "from L1 to L0" for "Xen on Xen" > > > 5. Migration a L1 Xen/KVM guest with a L2 running in that L1 > > > 6. L2 guest booting on "VirtualBox on Xen" > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yongjie (Jay) > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xen-devel mailing list > > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |