Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] VMX: fix interaction of Viridian emulation with advanced features

["Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich wrote on 2013-06-24:
>>>> On 24.06.13 at 03:00, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> George Dunlap wrote on 2013-06-22:
>>> It's a bit hard to tell which one of 1 or 2 is the lowest risk from a
>>> release perspective -- my instinct is to go with #1 (assuming I've
>>> understood it correctly), as it relies on expected behavior of the
>>> hardware, not on expected behavior of Windows.  But I think whichever
>>> you think is best is fine with me, as long as you get an Ack from Paul
>>> for #2.
>> I think both #1 and #2 are necessary. We cannot expect the OS always follows
>> the rule.
> 
> Sure, ultimately we want both. The question whether to limit ourselves
> to one of them is merely for the immediate 4.3 release.
If talking about 4.3 release, I agree with you. #2 is non-intrusive.

Best regards,
Yang



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel