|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/8] hvmloader: Fix check for needing a 64-bit bar
After attempting to resize the MMIO hole, the check to determine
whether there is a need to relocate BARs into 64-bit space checks the
specific thing that caused the loop to exit (MMIO hole == 2GiB) rather
than checking whether the required MMIO will fit in the hole.
But even then it does it wrong: the polarity of the check is
backwards.
Check for the actual condition we care about (the sizeof the MMIO
hole) rather than checking for the loop exit condition.
v3:
- Move earlier in the series, before other functional changes
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Hanweidong <hanweidong@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
---
tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
index a3d03ed..6792ed4 100644
--- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
+++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ void pci_setup(void)
((pci_mem_start << 1) != 0) )
pci_mem_start <<= 1;
- if ( (pci_mem_start << 1) != 0 )
+ if ( mmio_total > (pci_mem_end - pci_mem_start) )
{
printf("Low MMIO hole not large enough for all devices,"
" relocating some BARs to 64-bit\n");
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |