Re: [Xen-devel] S3 crash with VTD Queue Invalidation enabled

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 06.06.13 at 01:53, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On 05.06.13 at 17:25, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Depending on whether ATS is in use, more than one invalidation
>>>>> can be done in the processing here - could you therefore check
>>>>> whether there's any sign of ATS use ("iommu=verbose" should
>>>>> make you see respective messages), and if so see whether
>>>>> disabling it ("ats=off") makes a difference?
>>>>
>>>> ATS does not appear to be running:
>>>>
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:737: Host address width 36
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:751: found ACPI_DMAR_DRHD:
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:412:   dmaru->address = fed90000
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1197: drhd->address = fed90000 iommu->reg = 
>>>> ffff82c3ffd57000
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1199: cap = c0000020e60262 ecap = f0101a
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:338:  endpoint: 0000:00:02.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:751: found ACPI_DMAR_DRHD:
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:412:   dmaru->address = fed91000
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1197: drhd->address = fed91000 iommu->reg = 
>>>> ffff82c3ffd56000
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1199: cap = c9008020660262 ecap = f0105a
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:354:  IOAPIC: 0000:f0:1f.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.1
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.2
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.3
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.4
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.5
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.6
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:332:  MSI HPET: 0000:00:0f.7
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:426:   flags: INCLUDE_ALL
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:756: found ACPI_DMAR_RMRR:
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:338:  endpoint: 0000:00:1d.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:338:  endpoint: 0000:00:1a.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:625:   RMRR region: base_addr ba8d5000 end_address
>>>> ba8ebfff
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:756: found ACPI_DMAR_RMRR:
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:338:  endpoint: 0000:00:02.0
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:625:   RMRR region: base_addr bb800000 end_address
>>>> bf9fffff
>>>>
>>>> I would expect a line with "found ACPI_DMAR_ATSR" to be printed, if it
>>>> was found.
>>>
>>> Right. So one less variable.
>>
>> Some more info.
>> Ross Philipson provided me with a handy utility to dump a bunch more
>> info about the DMAR tables, and with some more trace, this appears to
>> be tied to the IGD.
>>
>> Early in the boot process, I see queue_invalidate_wait() called for
>> DRHD unit 0, and 1
>> (unit 0 is wired up to the IGD, unit 1 is everything else)
>>
>> Up until i915 does the following, I see that unit being flushed with
>> queue_invalidate_wait() :
>>
>> [    0.704537] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'
>> [    0.704537] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with x86_energy_p
>> (XEN) XXX queue_invalidate_wait:282 CPU0 DRHD0 ret=0
>> (XEN) XXX queue_invalidate_wait:282 CPU0 DRHD0 ret=0
>> [    1.983028] [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to
>> bit banging on pin 5
>> [    2.253551] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device
>> [    3.111838] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 170x48
>> [    3.171631] i915 0000:00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
>> [    3.171634] i915 0000:00:02.0: registered panic notifier
>> [    3.173339] acpi device:00: registered as cooling_device1
>> [    3.173401] ACPI: Video Device [VID] (multi-head: yes  rom: no  post: no)
>> [    3.173962] input: Video Bus as
>> /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/LNXVIDEO:00/input/input4
>> [    3.174232] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on 
> minor 0
>> [    3.174258] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: version 3.0
>> [    3.174270] xen: registering gsi 19 triggering 0 polarity 1
>> [    3.174274] Already setup the GSI :19
>>
>>
>> After that - the unit never seems to be flushed.
>>
>> ...until we enter into the S3 hypercall, which loops over all DRHD
>> units, and explicitly flushes all of them via iommu_flush_all()
>>
>> It is at that point that it hangs up when talking to the device that
>> the IGD is plumbed up to.
>>
>>
>> Does this point to something in the i915 driver doing something that
>> is incompatible with Xen?
> 
> I actually separated it from the S3 hypercall, adding a new debug key
> 'F' - to just call iommu_flush_all()
> I can crash it on demand with this.
> 
> Booting with "i915.modeset=0 single" (to prevent both KMS, and Xorg) -
> it does not occur.
> So, that pretty much narrows it down to the IGD, in my mind.

Indeed, I agree. Yet I can't in any way comment on what or why.
Xiantao (perhaps some graphics person would good to be Cc-ed
here too)?

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel