|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen-blk(front|back): Handle large physical sector disks
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:03:40PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 28.05.2013 18:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:55:22PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >> On 28.05.2013 14:47, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:02:35PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >>>> Changed the xenbus_gather but kept the xenbus_dev_error (without being
> >>>> fatal) as
> >>>> that seems closer to the style of the other calls.
> >>>
> >>> Hm, could you rebase this on top of stable/for-jens-3.10 please?
> >>>
> >>> I get this:
> >>>
> >>> patching file drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 704.
> >>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> >>> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c.rej
> >>> patching file drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 542.
> >>> patch: **** malformed patch at line 133: 16
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I rather suspect another TB fail. Lets try the same on-top-of-Linus and
> >> xen-git
> >> as attachements...
> >
> > So better, but stable/for-jens-3.10 has some extra changes.
> >
> > patch -p1 < /tmp/0001-xen-blk-Use-physical-sector-size-for-setup.patch
> > patching file drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 782 (offset 78 lines).
> > patching file drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 542.
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 629 (offset 65 lines).
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 736 (offset 68 lines).
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 736.
> > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1698 (offset 301 lines).
> > Hunk #6 succeeded at 1748 (offset 308 lines).
> > Hunk #7 succeeded at 1811 with fuzz 2 (offset 315 lines).
> > 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c.rej
> >
> >>
> >> -Stefan
> >>
> >
> Here a quickly done rebase. Best needs a compile test before but I did not get
> to it.
Applied.
>
>
>
> From 4f90805519c9380a9b88853112ed57cc6bd51759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:28:15 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/blk: Use physical sector size for setup
>
> Currently xen-blkback passes the logical sector size over xenbus and
> xen-blkfront sets up the paravirt disk with that logical block size.
> But newer drives usually have the logical sector size set to 512 for
> compatibility reasons and would show the actual sector size only in
> physical sector size.
> This results in the device being partitioned and accessed in dom0 with
> the correct sector size, but the guest thinks 512 bytes is the correct
> block size. And that results in poor performance.
>
> To fix this, blkback gets modified to pass also physical-sector-size
> over xenbus and blkfront to use both values to set up the paravirt
> disk. I did not just change the passed in sector-size because I am
> not sure having a bigger logical sector size than the physical one
> is valid (and that would happen if a newer dom0 kernel hits an older
> domU kernel). Also this way a domU set up before should still be
> accessible (just some tools might detect the unaligned setup).
>
> [v2: Make xenbus write failure non-fatal]
> [v3: Use xenbus_scanf instead of xenbus_gather]
> [v4: Rebased against segment changes]
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> index 4a4749c..7b06f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,11 @@ again:
> dev->nodename);
> goto abort;
> }
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "physical-sector-size", "%u",
> + bdev_physical_block_size(be->blkif->vbd.bdev));
> + if (err)
> + xenbus_dev_error(dev, err, "writing %s/physical-sector-size",
> + dev->nodename);
>
> err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0);
> if (err == -EAGAIN)
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index bac8cf3..f1f75c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ wait:
> }
>
> static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size,
> + unsigned int physical_sector_size,
> unsigned int segments)
> {
> struct request_queue *rq;
> @@ -629,6 +630,7 @@ static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16
> sector_size,
>
> /* Hard sector size and max sectors impersonate the equiv. hardware. */
> blk_queue_logical_block_size(rq, sector_size);
> + blk_queue_physical_block_size(rq, physical_sector_size);
> blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(rq, 512);
>
> /* Each segment in a request is up to an aligned page in size. */
> @@ -735,7 +737,8 @@ static char *encode_disk_name(char *ptr, unsigned int n)
>
> static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
> struct blkfront_info *info,
> - u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size)
> + u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size,
> + unsigned int physical_sector_size)
> {
> struct gendisk *gd;
> int nr_minors = 1;
> @@ -802,7 +805,7 @@ static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
> gd->driverfs_dev = &(info->xbdev->dev);
> set_capacity(gd, capacity);
>
> - if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size,
> + if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size, physical_sector_size,
> info->max_indirect_segments ? :
> BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST)) {
> del_gendisk(gd);
> @@ -1696,6 +1699,7 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
> {
> unsigned long long sectors;
> unsigned long sector_size;
> + unsigned int physical_sector_size;
> unsigned int binfo;
> int err;
> int barrier, flush, discard, persistent;
> @@ -1745,6 +1749,16 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info
> *info)
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * physcial-sector-size is a newer field, so old backends may not
> + * provide this. Assume physical sector size to be the same as
> + * sector_size in that case.
> + */
> + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> + "physical-sector-size", "%u", &physical_sector_size);
> + if (err != 1)
> + physical_sector_size = sector_size;
> +
> info->feature_flush = 0;
> info->flush_op = 0;
>
> @@ -1798,7 +1812,8 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
> return;
> }
>
> - err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size);
> + err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size,
> + physical_sector_size);
> if (err) {
> xenbus_dev_fatal(info->xbdev, err, "xlvbd_add at %s",
> info->xbdev->otherend);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |