[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/vtsc: update vcpu_time after hvm_set_guest_time
>>> On 04.06.13 at 11:56, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/04/2013 10:46 AM, Roger Pau Monnà wrote: >> Yes, the call in context_switch is now superseded by the one in >> hvm_do_resume for the HVM case. I will change it and resend the patch, >> thanks for the review. > > I agree that it's worth trying to avoid calling the same function twice; > but since the common case is for pt_restore_timer() to not actually make > any substantial changes to hvm_vcpu.stime_offset, I think it would be > better if we had the basic "update the system time" call shared between > HVM and PV codepaths, and have the uncommon case where > hvm_vcpu.stime_offset does change just call it twice. Makes sense to me. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |