[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 2/2] xenbus: delay xenbus frontend resume if xenstored is not running
>>> On 28.05.13 at 19:09, Aurelien Chartier <aurelien.chartier@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: > If the xenbus frontend is located in a domain running xenstored, the device > resume is hanging because it is happening before the process resume. This > patch adds extra logic to the resume code to check if we are the domain > running xenstored and delay the resume if needed. > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Chartier <aurelien.chartier@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Changes in v2: > - Instead of bypassing the resume, process it in a workqueue > Changes in v3: > - Add a struct work in xenbus_device to avoid dynamic allocation > - Several small code fixes > Changes in v4: > - Use a dedicated workqueue > Changes in v5: > - Move create_workqueue error handling to xenbus_frontend_dev_resume Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Yet nevertheless I'm still seeing room for improvement: > +static int xenbus_frontend_dev_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + /* > + * If xenstored is running in this domain, we cannot access the backend > + * state at the moment, so we need to defer xenbus_dev_resume > + */ > + if (xen_store_domain_type == XS_LOCAL) { > + struct xenbus_device *xdev = to_xenbus_device(dev); > + > + if (!xenbus_frontend_wq) { > + pr_err("%s: no workqueue to process delayed resume\n", > + xdev->nodename); > + return -EFAULT; Issuing a message here is fine, but I think you should also issue a pr_warn() at initialization time. > + } > + > + INIT_WORK(&xdev->work, xenbus_frontend_delayed_resume); And I also think that this would better be done once at initialization time too. > + queue_work(xenbus_frontend_wq, &xdev->work); > + > + return 0; > + } Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |