[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
On 2013-5-21 14:35, Wei Liu wrote: [....] + static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); @@ -125,13 +143,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) static void xenvif_up(struct xenvif *vif) { xen_netbk_add_xenvif(vif); - enable_irq(vif->irq); + enable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + enable_irq(vif->rx_irq); enable_irq are called twice in one event channel situation. How about adding if condition here to differ one event channel and split event channel? xen_netbk_check_rx_xenvif(vif); }static void xenvif_down(struct xenvif *vif){ - disable_irq(vif->irq); + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); Same as enable_irq. del_timer_sync(&vif->credit_timeout); xen_netbk_deschedule_xenvif(vif); xen_netbk_remove_xenvif(vif); @@ -308,12 +328,13 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid, }int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref,- unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int evtchn) + unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int tx_evtchn, + unsigned int rx_evtchn) { int err = -ENOMEM;/* Already connected through? */- if (vif->irq) + if (vif->tx_irq) return 0;__module_get(THIS_MODULE);@@ -322,13 +343,38 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, if (err < 0) goto err;- err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler(- vif->domid, evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, - vif->dev->name, vif); - if (err < 0) - goto err_unmap; - vif->irq = err; - disable_irq(vif->irq); + if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) { + /* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */ + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, + vif->dev->name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_unmap; + vif->tx_irq = vif->rx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); Same as above. + } else { + /* feature-split-event-channels == 1 */ + snprintf(vif->tx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->tx_irq_name), + "%s-tx", vif->dev->name); + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_tx_interrupt, 0, + vif->tx_irq_name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_unmap; + vif->tx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + + snprintf(vif->rx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->rx_irq_name), + "%s-rx", vif->dev->name); + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, rx_evtchn, xenvif_rx_interrupt, 0, + vif->rx_irq_name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_tx_unbind; + vif->rx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); + }xenvif_get(vif); @@ -342,6 +388,9 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref,rtnl_unlock();return 0;+err_tx_unbind: + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + vif->tx_irq = 0; err_unmap: xen_netbk_unmap_frontend_rings(vif); err: @@ -375,8 +424,13 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif) atomic_dec(&vif->refcnt); wait_event(vif->waiting_to_free, atomic_read(&vif->refcnt) == 0);- if (vif->irq) {- unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->irq, vif); + if (vif->tx_irq) { + if (vif->tx_irq == vif->rx_irq) + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + else { + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->rx_irq, vif); + } /* vif->irq is valid, we had a module_get in * xenvif_connect. */ diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c index 2d9477f..ccfbb74 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> #include <asm/xen/page.h>+/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as+ * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are + * enabled by default. + */ +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1; +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644); + /* * This is the maximum slots a skb can have. If a guest sends a skb * which exceeds this limit it is considered malicious. @@ -662,7 +669,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) { struct xenvif *vif = NULL, *tmp; s8 status; - u16 irq, flags; + u16 flags; struct xen_netif_rx_response *resp; struct sk_buff_head rxq; struct sk_buff *skb; @@ -771,7 +778,6 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) sco->meta_slots_used);RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->rx, ret);- irq = vif->irq; if (ret && list_empty(&vif->notify_list)) list_add_tail(&vif->notify_list, ¬ify);@@ -783,7 +789,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk)}list_for_each_entry_safe(vif, tmp, ¬ify, notify_list) {- notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->rx_irq); list_del_init(&vif->notify_list); }@@ -1762,7 +1768,7 @@ static void make_tx_response(struct xenvif *vif,vif->tx.rsp_prod_pvt = ++i; RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->tx, notify); if (notify) - notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->tx_irq); }static struct xen_netif_rx_response *make_rx_response(struct xenvif *vif,diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c index d230c14..461efc6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ static int netback_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, goto abort_transaction; }+ /* Split event channels support */+ err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, + "feature-split-event-channels", + "%u", feature_split_event_channels); + if (err) { + message = "writing feature-split-event-channels"; + goto abort_transaction; + } + err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0); } while (err == -EAGAIN);@@ -393,21 +402,36 @@ static int connect_rings(struct backend_info *be)struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; struct xenbus_device *dev = be->dev; unsigned long tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref; - unsigned int evtchn, rx_copy; + unsigned int tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn, rx_copy; int err; int val;err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,"tx-ring-ref", "%lu", &tx_ring_ref, - "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, - "event-channel", "%u", &evtchn, NULL); + "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, NULL); if (err) { xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, - "reading %s/ring-ref and event-channel", + "reading %s/ring-ref", dev->otherend); return err; }+ /* Try split event channels first, then single event channel. */+ err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, + "event-channel-tx", "%u", &tx_evtchn, + "event-channel-rx", "%u", &rx_evtchn, NULL); + if (err) { + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, + "event-channel", "%u", &tx_evtchn, NULL); + if (err) { + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, + "reading %s/event-channel(-tx/rx)", + dev->otherend); This err really comes from reading original implementation(one event channel), right? So it is better to not use (-tx/rx) here? Or using two xenbus_dev_fatal to print log: one for reading tx/rx failure, the other for one event channel failure. Thanks Annie _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |