Re: [Xen-devel] New Xen boot infrastructure proposal

[Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:25:19PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:27 +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 03:36 -0700, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > > It means
> > > > > that at this stage it is worth to create completely new
> > > > > boot structure which is not linked so tightly with any boot
> > > > > protocol. It should contain all needed stuff, be architecture
> > > > > independent as much as possible and easily extensible.
> > > >
> > > > Is this proposal intended to form a protocol between the bootloader and
> > >
> > > More or less.
> >
> > So we are expecting bootloaders to all implement this Xen specific,
> ....
>
> actually, I'm confused, the other sub-threads here seem to suggest this
> protocol is between the "preloader" bits of Xen and the main body of
> Xen, which is the other alternative I gave.

Sorry for confusion. I put my reply in incorrect line. I think about
protocol "between the "preloader" bits of Xen and the main body of Xen".

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel