Re: [Xen-devel] New Xen boot infrastructure proposal

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 22.05.13 at 17:01, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If we stick to current MBI I am not able to pass (in sensible way),
> from preloader to __start_xen(), e.g. ACPI and EFI stuff from multiboot2
> protocol.

Why? You get handed a list (almost like an array) of items, and you'd
pass the base address instead of the base address of the multiboot
structure that we pass right now, together with an indicator which
of the two it is. Then __start_xen() has to adopt its behavior to this.
Not a big deal afaict.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel