[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] AMD/iommu: SR56x0 Erratum 64 - Reset Command and Event head & tail pointers
>>> On 21.05.13 at 16:52, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reference at time of patch: > http://support.amd.com/us/ChipsetMotherboard_TechDocs/46303.pdf > > Erratum 64 states that the head and tail pointers for the Command buffer and > Event log are only reset on a cold boot, not a warm boot. > > While the erratum is limited to systems using SR56xx chipsets (such as > Family > 10h CPUs), resetting the pointers is a sensible action in all cases. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> You sent this twice in close succession - is there any difference between the two instances? > The code appears to lack an MMIO 64bit write function which would be the > correct solution here. However, for these four registers, bit 19 is the > highest non-reserved bit, meaning that the writel() will do the correct > thing. > > I suspect that a writeq() function would make a huge difference to the > legibility and brevity of this code. Oh, we should of course have a writeq() - I think I stumbled across the lack thereof too, and probably more than once. > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c > @@ -154,6 +154,15 @@ static void register_iommu_cmd_buffer_in > IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_LENGTH_MASK, > IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_LENGTH_SHIFT, &entry); > writel(entry, iommu->mmio_base+IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_BASE_HIGH_OFFSET); > + > + /* AMD SR56x0 Erratum 64. CMD buffer head and tail pointers are not > reset > + * on warm boot. A newer BIOS may or may not do this for us, as per the > + * workaround advise. > + * > + * However, it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally. > + */ > + writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_HEAD_OFFSET); > + writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_TAIL_OFFSET); > } > > static void register_iommu_event_log_in_mmio_space(struct amd_iommu *iommu) > @@ -182,6 +191,15 @@ static void register_iommu_event_log_in_ > IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_LENGTH_MASK, > IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_LENGTH_SHIFT, &entry); > writel(entry, iommu->mmio_base+IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_BASE_HIGH_OFFSET); > + > + /* AMD SR56x0 Erratum 64. Event log head and tail pointers are not reset > + * on warm boot. A newer BIOS may or may not do this for us, as per the > + * workaround advise. > + * > + * However, it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally. > + */ > + writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_HEAD_OFFSET); > + writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_TAIL_OFFSET); > } > > static void register_iommu_ppr_log_in_mmio_space(struct amd_iommu *iommu) If "it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally", why don't you then also do the same for the PPR log? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |