[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] AMD/iommu: SR56x0 Erratum 64 - Reset Command and Event head & tail pointers



>>> On 21.05.13 at 16:52, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Reference at time of patch:
> http://support.amd.com/us/ChipsetMotherboard_TechDocs/46303.pdf 
> 
> Erratum 64 states that the head and tail pointers for the Command buffer and
> Event log are only reset on a cold boot, not a warm boot.
> 
> While the erratum is limited to systems using SR56xx chipsets (such as 
> Family
> 10h CPUs), resetting the pointers is a sensible action in all cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

You sent this twice in close succession - is there any difference
between the two instances?

> The code appears to lack an MMIO 64bit write function which would be the
> correct solution here.  However, for these four registers, bit 19 is the
> highest non-reserved bit, meaning that the writel() will do the correct 
> thing.
> 
> I suspect that a writeq() function would make a huge difference to the
> legibility and brevity of this code.

Oh, we should of course have a writeq() - I think I stumbled across
the lack thereof too, and probably more than once.

> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,15 @@ static void register_iommu_cmd_buffer_in
>                           IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_LENGTH_MASK,
>                           IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_LENGTH_SHIFT, &entry);
>      writel(entry, iommu->mmio_base+IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_BASE_HIGH_OFFSET);
> +
> +    /* AMD SR56x0 Erratum 64.  CMD buffer head and tail pointers are not 
> reset
> +     * on warm boot.  A newer BIOS may or may not do this for us, as per the
> +     * workaround advise.
> +     *
> +     * However, it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally.
> +     */
> +    writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_HEAD_OFFSET);
> +    writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_CMD_BUFFER_TAIL_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
>  static void register_iommu_event_log_in_mmio_space(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
> @@ -182,6 +191,15 @@ static void register_iommu_event_log_in_
>                          IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_LENGTH_MASK,
>                          IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_LENGTH_SHIFT, &entry);
>      writel(entry, iommu->mmio_base+IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_BASE_HIGH_OFFSET);
> +
> +    /* AMD SR56x0 Erratum 64.  Event log head and tail pointers are not reset
> +     * on warm boot.  A newer BIOS may or may not do this for us, as per the
> +     * workaround advise.
> +     *
> +     * However, it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally.
> +     */
> +    writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_HEAD_OFFSET);
> +    writel(0, iommu->mmio_base + IOMMU_EVENT_LOG_TAIL_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
>  static void register_iommu_ppr_log_in_mmio_space(struct amd_iommu *iommu)

If "it is a safe and sensible action to perform unconditionally", why
don't you then also do the same for the PPR log?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.