Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/20] PVH xen: introduce pvh.c

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.05.13 at 02:08, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 07:43:19 +0100
> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> >>> On 17.05.13 at 02:27, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 16 May 2013 09:00:44 +0100
>> > "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > 
>> >> >>> On 16.05.13 at 03:42, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >>> wrote:
> .... 
>> > My understanding with previous maintainers was, establish a
>> > baseline with something working, then keep adding bells and
>> > whistles to it. This is an effort to that end. I am also OK
>> > dropping the ball on pvh and let someones else who can finish it
>> > all in one shot do it.
>> 
>> And I already indicated various places where I'm fine with such
>> compromises. But this one - with the code already working for PV
>> and HVM guests - I simply expect would work without you doing
>> _anything_ (or if not, it must be something really simple that needs
>> adjustment).
> 
> Actually, now that pvh.c has shrunk a lot, and code is very similar
> to hvm.c, are you OK if I just add some code to hvm.c and get rid of
> pvh.c?

Sure.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel