[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Don't hardcode event channel IRQ
On 05/20/2013 04:32 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 11:49 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> @@ -467,9 +477,41 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, const struct >> dt_device_node *np) >> >> static int map_devices_from_device_tree(struct domain *d) >> { >> + bool_t ppis[NR_PPI_IRQS] = {0}; >> + int res; >> + unsigned int i; >> + >> ASSERT(dt_host && (dt_host->sibling == NULL)); >> >> - return handle_node(d, dt_host); >> + res = handle_node(d, dt_host, ppis); >> + >> + /* >> + * Fill by hand timer IRQS ppis as we don't map it in Dom0 >> + * We assume the host IRQs and the dom0 IRQs are the same for the timer. > > This seems a bit fragile, what happens if new interrupts are added in > the future? Right, but it's only for the timer as timer is "shared" between Xen and dom0 (ie: we fake the timer IRQs). > Can the gic.c code not track the PPIs which are either assigned to Xen > or a guest? > Or perhaps better vgic.c should know if which if any IRQs are routed for > a given guest. We may need to add a function to allow the vtimer code to > reserve the virtual interrupts which it is going to use. Seems odd that > we don't have an existing equivalent to gic_route_irq_to_guest in > vtimer.c... vtimer will manually inject the virtual IRQ as IRQs are forwarded to the running vCPU. gic_route_irq_to_guest will always route to a specific domain. I though to add a new value for dt_used_by which parse the device node IRQ/range but not map them in the domain. Because we don't need to know if the IRQ is a PPI after the end of construct_dom0. >> + */ >> + for ( i = TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI; i < MAX_TIMER_PPI; i++ ) >> + { >> + const struct dt_irq *irq = timer_dt_irq(i); >> + >> + if ( irq_is_ppi(irq->irq) ) >> + ppis[irq->irq - FIRST_PPI_IRQ] = 1; >> + } >> + >> + /* Start from the last PPIs and decrease to find a free PPI */ >> + for ( i = NR_PPI_IRQS; i != 0; i-- ) >> + { >> + if ( !ppis[i - 1] ) >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if ( i == 0 ) >> + panic("Can't find a free PPI for the event channel IRQ\n"); >> + >> + d->arch.evtchn_irq = (i - 1) + FIRST_PPI_IRQ; >> + >> + printk(XENLOG_INFO "DOM0 Event channel IRQ: %u\n", d->arch.evtchn_irq); >> + >> + return res; >> } >> >> static int prepare_dtb(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo) >> @@ -546,16 +588,16 @@ int construct_dom0(struct domain *d) >> >> d->max_pages = ~0U; >> >> - rc = prepare_dtb(d, &kinfo); >> + map_devices_from_device_tree(d); > > May as well make map_devices_from_device_tree void then, it seems ot > always succeeds or panics. Will be fixed on the next version of the patch. -- Julien _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |