[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Bug report and patch about IRQ freezing after gic_restore_state
On 05/20/2013 01:41 AM, Jaeyong Yoo wrote: Hello, > I'm running xen on Arndale board and if I run both iperf and du command at > Dom0, > one of IRQ (either SATA or network) suddenly stop occuring anymore. > After some investigation, I found out that when context switching at Xen, > IRQs in LR (about to be delivered to Doms) could be lost and never occur > anymore. > Here goes function call sequence that this problem occurs: > (in context switching) > - schedule_tail > - ctxt_switch_from > - local_irq_enable > - // after this part, some IRQ can occur and could be directly written > to LR > - ctxt_switch_to > - ... (some more functions) > - // before the above IRQ is delivered to Dom (and maintenance IRQ > not called), > // gic_restore_state can be called > - gic_restore_state /* when restoring gic state, the above IRQ > * (written to LR) is overwritten > * to the previous values, and somehow, > * the corresponding IRQ never occur > again */ > > I made the following patch (i.e., enable local irq after gic_restore_state) > for preventing the above problem. Thanks for the patch, I was looking with a similar error on the Arndale Board for a couple of day. > Signed-off-by: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++-- > xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > index f71b582..2c3b132 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static void ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *n) > /* VGIC */ > gic_restore_state(n); > + local_irq_enable(); > + Could you move the local_irq_enable right after ctxt_switch_to? > /* XXX VFP */ > /* XXX MPU */ > @@ -215,8 +217,6 @@ static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev) > { > ctxt_switch_from(prev); > - local_irq_enable(); > - > /* TODO > update_runstate_area(current); > */ > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > index d4f0a43..8186ad8 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > @@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ void gic_restore_state(struct vcpu *v) > if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) ) > return; > - spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock); > + spin_lock(&gic.lock); > this_cpu(lr_mask) = v->arch.lr_mask; > for ( i=0; i<nr_lrs; i++) > GICH[GICH_LR + i] = v->arch.gic_lr[i]; > - spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock); > + spin_unlock(&gic.lock); As the IRQ is disabled and the GICH registers can only be modified by the current physical CPU, I think you can remove the spin_{,un}lock and replace it by a dsb. > GICH[GICH_APR] = v->arch.gic_apr; > GICH[GICH_HCR] = GICH_HCR_EN; > isb(); Cheers, -- Julien _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |