[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 2/2] xenbus: delay xenbus frontend resume if xenstored is not running
>>> On 16.05.13 at 14:34, Aurelien Chartier <aurelien.chartier@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: > @@ -440,6 +467,13 @@ static int __init xenbus_probe_frontend_init(void) > > register_xenstore_notifier(&xenstore_notifier); > > + xenbus_frontend_wq = create_workqueue("xenbus_frontend"); > + if (!xenbus_frontend_wq) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: create " > + "xenbus_frontend_workqueue failed\n", __func__); pr_err() should be the norm these days. And personally I consider it quite bad a habit to put function names in non-debugging log messages - this doesn't really help with anything (as long as the rest of the message is meaningful), but clutters the log. And finally, you need to do proper error handling here - this code can be built as a module, and hence leaving notifier and bus registered upon failure sets up the kernel for crashing. Moving the code ahead of register_xenstore_notifier() will take care of one half of the problem, but you'll nevertheless will need to call bus_unregister() if you really intend to make this a fatal error condition (which by itself is questionable since in most scenarios you won't need the work queue at all). Jan > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + > return 0; > } > subsys_initcall(xenbus_probe_frontend_init); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |