[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 development update
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Anthony we did some considerations as follow based on our tests: > > - According to this link: > http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/libxl_memory.txt we > noticed that on hvm domU the videomemory is actually passed > separately by guest ram and after the build start. > > - In presence of the xen hypervisor seabios gets some > parameters/tables from hvmloader, which is not the case in absence > of xen hypervisor. > So did anyone track down if seabios gets the correct configuration with Xen/hvmloader with QXL device enabled? Is there some simple way to dump the seabios active configuration from the VM? I understand the method of handing out configuration to seabios is different between plain Qemu and Xen/hvmloader. > - On qemu log when qxl is enabled and qemu crashes there are error > about memory address, which may be related to some mismatch between > hvmloader's tables and/or actual libxl memory settings. > I guess checking/comparing seabios configuration in the following cases: - Plain Qemu with stdvga compared to Plain Qemu with QXL - Xen with stdvga compared to Xen with QXL Might help to see the difference in (seabios) configuration between non-Xen and Xen? Btw does /proc/iomem reveal anything interesting in the VM, again Non-Xen QXL vs. Xen QXL ? Just some thoughts.. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |