Re: [Xen-devel] bison/flex version requirements

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] bison/flex version requirements"):
> IIRC RHEL5 is too old.  It had a totally ancient version of at least
> one of flex or bison which couldn't even produce reentrant
> scanners/parsers.

Searching my mail archives turned up this:
  http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-07/msg01237.html

In that message I assert that RHEL5 has a version of flex from _1993_.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel