[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:06:43PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:18:24PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > > > When driver load and unload in a loop, pirq will exhaust finally. > > > Try to use the same pirq which was already mapped and binded at first time > > > > So what happens if I unload and reload two drivers in random order? > > > > > when driver loaded. > > > > > > Read pirq from msix entry and test if data is XEN_PIRQ_MSI_DATA > > > xen_irq_from_pirq(pirq) < 0 checking is wrong as irq will be freed > > > when driver unload, it's always true in second load. > > > > If my understanding is right the issue at hand is that the caching > > information about the pirq disappears once the driver has been > > unloaded b/c the event's irq-info is removed (as the driver is > > unloaded and free_irq is called). > > > > Stefano, > > Is there a specific write to the MSI structure that would cause the > > hypervisor to drop the PIRQ? Or a nice hypercall to "free" an > > PIRQ in usage? > > We already have a "free PIRQ" hypercall, it's called > PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq and should be called by QEMU. Considering that we call function that allocates (PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq) it in the Linux kernel (and not in QEMU), perhaps that should be done in the Linux kernel as part of xen_destroy_irq()? Or would that confuse QEMU? It looks like QEMU only does that hypercall (via xc_physdev_unmap_pirq) unregister_real_device which is only called during pci unplug? > Linux should disable the MSI bit in the PCI config options of the > device: > > pci_disable_msi -> pci_msi_shutdown -> msi_set_enable(0) Zhenzhong, does it do that? Looking at the driver it certainly seems that way. > > That should cause QEMU to issue a xc_physdev_unmap_pirq that actually > unmaps the pirq. If it doesn't, it's a bug :) <sigh> It doesn't do that. So two bugs: - QEMU doing that - Linux kernel doing the hypercall as well. > > > > I presume that on the first load the msg.data value is > > ALWAYS != XEN_PIRQ_MSI_DATA right? Is that somethign we can ALWAYS > > depend? Or is there a possibility that it could be that when the > > PCI device is unplugged from one guest and plugged in another? > > > > Could we use PHYSDEVOP_irq_status_query to figure out if the PIRQ > > has been already allocated? Ah, does not look like it. > > > > I am a bit worried about depending on just msg.data to tells us > > whether the device had been initialized before. > > Data comes from QEMU, I think it is zeroed at init time. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |