Re: [Xen-devel] Test report for xen-unstable and qemu-xen

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/05/13 14:28, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> > > - tools: Improve make deb
> > Is this needed in upstream Xen?
> I thing is very useful, it helps me to save a lot of time onhundreds 
> of tests build that I've done.
> I think that now without this make debball is unusable, I think that 
> atleast these parts must be applied:
> - Remove version from installed package name for correct update
> - Add conffiles to manage main config files on package update
>
> I already posted it but rejected :(
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-02/msg02483.html
Yes, as we said in the discussions, we don't want the output of "make 
debball" useable as a full-fledged Debian package.  The general 
consensus (IIRC) was that we'd be happy if someone were to step up and 
maintain such a set of packages, however.
> > > -------------------------
> > > New issue:
> > > - nested hvm probably bugged: started test it on windows 7 pro 64
> > > domU on qemu-xen,
> > >    xpmode crash on install without show any error, nor error on logs
> > > even if havdetection
> > >    completes  with success
> > > -------------
> > George: Should we track this nested hvm issue on the Xen 4.3 status 
> > emails?
This needs a proper report -- it doesn't say what cpu is being used.

> > > -------------------------
> > > Old issue:
> > > - Network is not working after restore on Windows domU with qemu-xen
> > > and gplpv
> > >    Workaround: fixed mac address since it changes after each restore
> > And also this one?
I'll put this on my list.  Not sure if this will be a release blocker, 
we'll see.
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel