Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: eliminate duplicated definition of spin_unlock_wait

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chen Baozi, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:31:01 +0800, a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <baozich@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h          | 2 +-
>  extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h 
> b/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h
> index 70cf20f..6604e3c 100644
> --- a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h
> +++ b/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  
>  #define spin_is_locked(x)    arch_spin_is_locked(x)
>  
> -#define spin_unlock_wait(x)  do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x))
> +#define spin_unlock_wait(x)  arch_spin_unlock_wait(x)
>  
>  
>  #define _spin_trylock(lock)     ({_raw_spin_trylock(lock) ? \
> diff --git a/extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h 
> b/extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h
> index 4b8faf7..c08b6f1 100644
> --- a/extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h
> +++ b/extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #define arch_spin_is_locked(x)       (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->slock) 
> <= 0)
> -#define spin_unlock_wait(x)  do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x))
> +#define arch_spin_unlock_wait(x) do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x))
>  
>  #define spin_lock_string \
>          "1:\n" \
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 

-- 
Samuel
R: Parce que ça renverse bêtement l'ordre naturel de lecture!
Q: Mais pourquoi citer en fin d'article est-il si effroyable?
R: Citer en fin d'article
Q: Quelle est la chose la plus désagréable sur les groupes de news?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel